Home » Posts tagged 'Educational Technology'

Tag Archives: Educational Technology

Including Comments on WordPress Author Pages

This is a little (hell, VERY) technical–but it might be useful to some, and it seems like my most technical posts get the most attention somehow! ūüôā

When running a WordPress site with multiple authors (a class site is a perfect example), sometimes you want to see all the posts by one author gathered together. ¬†WordPress makes this quite easy–you can just go to www.name-of-site/author/authors-username ¬†. Or there is even a sidebar widget to automatically list all the authors names, linked to those pages with all their posts.

But we’ve found that many times, on a class site, a professor (or maybe even visitors to the site like other students) will want to easily review everything that a given student has done. ¬†In other words, they want an author archive page that includes all the posts by that author, and also all the comments that that author has left on posts written by others

This was surprisingly difficult to find a way to accomplish. ¬†There are a couple of plugins that do something like this–but not exactly–and I couldn’t even get the best candidate among them to work at all.

So I decided to get my hands dirty. ¬†When WordPress displays that author’s page, it looks (first) for a file called author.php . ¬†And you can (in a child theme or editing a theme or creating a theme) customize that file to display what you want.

I made a child theme of the Twentyeleven default theme, and put a new author.php file in that child.  The code is already there in the existing author.php to queue the first post, identifying the author, and then run the loop to pull all posts by that author.

I added a small piece of code–of course this has to be enclosed in the usual <?php and ?>

$comment_author = get_the_author_id()

That just pulls the author_id that we’re going to need in the next bit of code to find all the comments by that author.

Then the next bit of code, which took me far too long to figure out how to write, grabs all the comments by that author, and displays them one by one, with each one including a line about when it is was posted, and what post (with a link) it was commenting on. This could all be customized–and yes, this also needs to be enclosed in <?php and ?>

$comments = get_comments(array(user_id=>$comment_author));
foreach($comments as $comment) :
$url = ‘<a href=”‘ . get_permalink($comment->comment_post_ID) . ‘”>’ . get_the_title($comment->comment_post_ID) . ‘</a>’;
echo (‘”‘ . $comment->comment_content . ‘” <br> –( posted on ‘ . get_comment_date(‘M j, Y’) . ‘, commenting on the post ‘ . $url . ‘ )<br /> <br>’);
endforeach;

If you try copying and pasting that code, do be careful about the single and double quotes. I’m not going to bother fixing them all, but they do need to be plain, not curly or “smart” single and double quotation marks. The code is fussy that way!

That’s about it. I also changed the template a bit so that the posts would not be displayed in their entirety, but just as titles linking to the full posts. And I turned off pagination for this page.

An example of it in action, which may not last, since it’s a demo site I use for lots of things, is here.

Hope this is useful for anyone who comes across it!

Early iPad thoughts

So I’m writing this on Thursday, after receiving my iPad (no, I didn’t stand on line, I had it delivered!) on Saturday.¬† That’s only about five days of use so far–but I do have some early indicators and ideas and reactions, and I thought I’d share them–especially because I just returned from a three-day trip to California (to Google–about which more in a later post), and I brought the iPad on the trip as my only computer.¬† I left the laptop at home.

First–the simple bottom line.¬† It’s a great device.¬† It was just fine as my only device on the trip, and while I wouldn’t want it to be (nor is it meant to be) my only computer at all, it’s good for even an extended time away from home.¬† So if you want only to know a simple thumbs up or down, read no further.¬† Thumbs up all the way.

But the longer response is that there are several ways in which the device is great, and those are worth exploring.¬† And of course there are ways in which it is not so great.¬† I’ll get to those, too.¬† So read on.

Why?

A student in my Alternate Worlds class asked “Professor Ugoretz, I was just wondering what inclined you to buy an IPad. I find the IPad to be another fad that symbolizes that one is keeping up in style.”¬† I think that was a good question–and for me there are answers on several levels.

First, personally, I like new gadgets, I like to try them out and test them and see what they can do.¬† I like to push them to their limits and beyond (I’m sure an iPad jailbreak will be available soon, and I’ll probably try that as I did with the iPhone).¬† So maybe that is the “fad” aspect that my student was asking about.¬† (But I certainly don’t much care what other people think of me having it, and I’m certainly not stylish in other ways.)

But it goes beyond the personal.¬† Professionally, it’s part of my job to think about how new technologies can be or will be used in educational settings, and to take the opportunity to test that.

So there was never really any doubt in my mind that I would be trying the iPad right from the first.

What I love

The list is actually pretty long, but it all fits together under the category of the interface.¬† I’ve seen lots of criticisms of the iPad saying that “it’s just a big iPod Touch” or “it’s just an underpowered tablet.”¬† I think both of those miss a critical element of what this device is.¬† It’s all about the interface.¬† The iPad is designed around this fact, and that makes all the difference.¬† Interacting with content without a mouse, with a direct touch of your own finger, makes everything more immediate and intimate.¬† When you add the mobility of the iPhone, but with a truly usable screen-size and resolution, it’s a major advantage.¬† I have had trouble letting go of the thing since I got it.¬† You always want it in your hand.

It’s true that it’s a device more for consumption than for creation, which was a criticism I heard and shared before I held it, but it’s also true that consuming media through this interface is a radically different kind of consumption, closer to creation.¬† More about that in the context of ebooks in a minute.

But it’s not just about consumption.¬† It’s only been five days, and already (from the start, in fact) we have the iWork suite which really is all about creation.¬† I’m not too experienced with and haven’t thought much about Numbers yet.¬† But Keynote and Pages on the iPad are completely different experiences than they were on a computer.¬† Keynote was always already far superior to MS PowerPoint, and on the iPad it becomes a whole new thing entirely.¬† Moving images on a slide with your finger, twisting and rotating them with two fingers, aligning them and rearranging them and having text flow around them automatically all with your own body as the only real tool you notice–that makes the process of creating a slideshow presentation into something like building or sculpting.¬† And a “word processing” “document” that can so easily include images which are really integrated with the words permits the easy (for everyone, not just the adept) creation of documents that do things that paper-based (“dead-tree”? “old-fashioned”?) documents can’t.¬† Creating documents (and of course presentations) can be more than just text–with ease and elegance in the process, too.

When you remove obstacles like a mouse (even if it didn’t seem like such a big obstacle before) from the process of making, building, presentations or documents, those presentations or documents can be a more direct and more informal and more frequently created and creative experience.¬† I see that as an unqualified good.

Back to consumption–something similar happens there.¬† I’ve been reading ebooks on the small screen (beginning with a Palm V, then a Treo, then an iPhone) for a long time.¬† I have never really minded the small screen, and I have always very much liked, loved, the backlight (I am a person who absolutely can not sleep without reading first, and the ebook with backlit screen is the perfect reading-in-bed solution).¬† But the iPad takes this to another level.¬† The big bright screen (and never let anyone tell you that color isn’t important) is great.¬† The page-turn interface is good (although not terribly important to me).¬† But making the text searchable (Ann Kirschner, my colleague at Macaulay, calls this an “instant concordance” and that’s a perfect term) and linkable to the web or wikipedia and integrated with a dictionary, at the touch of a finger, really takes advantage of what electronic books can do that paper books can not.¬† I don’t think ebooks should replace paper books.¬† I don’t think they ever will.¬† Paper books can do things that ebooks can not.¬† But the opposite is also true.¬† The iPad is the first device I’ve seen that really elegantly and completely lets ebooks be what they can be at best, instead of just seeing them as some kind of partly adequate substitute for a paper book.

Where this fits in

Let me take that ebook theme a little farther–specifically in terms of what this could mean for education.¬† There has been a lot of attention to Theodore Gray’s simply amazing “The Elements” iPad app.¬† This is where I think ebook initiatives for higher education should be going.¬† Not to simply re-create paper textbooks, but to do things that an ebook can do that paper can not.¬† The use of multimedia, the hyperlinks, the brilliant color and sound and factual information.¬† This is a learning tool.¬† A book is, too, but this is a radically different kind of learning tool.¬† It’s not really fair to call it a textbook.

More than just the multimedia and flashy (which are not trivial) effects, the tone of the factual information is critically important.¬† I think that web-based (or iPad-based) educational resources have the opportunity–the obligation–to explore different tones that more closely fit their media.¬† This is one of the huge strengths of the best (in my humble, biased, opinion) open educational resource right now, Smarthistory (for which I eagerly await the iPad app!)

Where the iPad can fit in higher education is in two connected areas– first, in helping to make possible these new ways of consuming content–these kinds of educational resources, learning tools, which are designed for the new medium and its own advantages, rather than trying to replicate the previous medium.¬† So that “consuming” really isn’t the right word–there’s a kind of direct interaction with the content–almost a type of creation itself.¬† And second, in helping to make possible these new ways of creating content–again taking advantage of exactly what the medium can do–using the tools (fingers) and the ideas directly, to create what you see and think and mean.¬† I really want to see where students will go with this–what kinds of presentations and effects and documents they will create and what kinds of responses and interactions they will have.¬† And third, that ease and intimacy of creating content and interacting with already-created content is really going to encourage and multiply that more informal, conversational, dialogic, provisional, digressive, tone. And all of that is what will be coming soon.

What is to come

2372-presidentpadd-homefront
The 24th-Century iPad?

What will be coming soon?¬† That’s the real beauty here.¬† The apps that are there now are only hints of what I’m sure will be coming.¬† Video editing? No real reason it won’t be possible.¬† Social annotation of images or texts?¬† Absolutely needs an app and I’m sure we’ll see one.¬† There’s room for brilliant developers here.¬† And rewards.¬† Sure, Apple controls the app store.¬† I don’t see that as being such a huge problem as some of my colleagues do.

We just don’t really know how the apps are going to come, when and what they’ll be, and that is really what is going to make this device shine.¬† For the iPhone, the apps have always been the main advantage–and for the iPad that’s going to be even more the case.

And hardware improvements, too–like a camera for videoconferencing, I guess–are certainly coming down the road.¬† This is the very first device of its type (no previous tablet has been in this genre.¬† It’s not the same kind of thing).¬† So there are naturally going to be competitors and improvements and new versions.¬† But long before any of that, we’re going to see more and more and better and better new apps.¬† I’m hoping some of our students will be building them!

What is not so great

No review would be complete without a few complaints! No device is perfect.¬† The keyboard is going to take some getting used to.¬† I think for extended writing, I’m going to want to use an external keyboard.¬† I can’t really touchtype very well on the iPad keyboard using all my fingers–even in landscape mode.

The rich text editor in WordPress is not compatible with the iPad browser in some way.¬† You can use the html edit window, but can’t type or edit at all in the rich text.¬† I’m sure there’s going to be a quick and easy solution for that soon (and the iPad WordPress app is OK–but not great for a WPMU install.¬† All of this may be moot with WordPress 3.0).

And this is not an iPad issue, but a Google Docs issue. You can view, but you can not edit, Google Docs (except spreadsheets) in the iPad browser (same is true for every mobile browser–including the iPhone).¬† I’ve been told that Google, as well as QuickOffice and other third parties, are working on fixes for this very soon.¬† Similarly, I’d like to see some close integration (opening, saving, editing) with Dropbox.¬† That could really make the whole cloud thing work with the iPad in great ways.

There are also some typical 1.0 type glitches.¬† Some websites don’t load or crash safari.¬† Some apps aren’t quite stable yet.¬† But those are really minor, infrequent, and to be expected.¬† This is a 1.0 version, after all!¬† I have not experienced the wifi issues that some users have reported.¬† Wifi has been strong and reliable for me so far.

So that’s where things stand right now!¬† I’m not the only iPad reviewer on the web by any means–but that’s how it looks from my own perspective.

WordCamp NYC

Coming this Saturday, and it should be a great day. Many CUNY colleagues presenting and (I hope) attending, too. I’ll be on the roundtable on the future of WordPress in Education, and presenting my own eportfolio spiel:

Eportfolios are (too often) seen as tools for assessment, for assignments, or for career placement. But thanks to WordPress and BuddyPress, at Macaulay Honors College, we’ve been able to set up an entirely flexible and free tool, allowing students (and faculty, and instructional technology fellows) to redefine the term “Eportfolio” and to let them each create a “Cabinet of Curiosities” or a “Museum of Me,” which promotes reflection, interaction, and truly integrative learning. These eportfolios are student-driven and student-designed, and the flexibility of WordPress allows us to watch as students forge new paths, and create an eportfolio model which is new in higher education, and which has the potential to work for students beyond the classroom, beyond the college.

Apples and Oranges and Lectures and Learning

photo by Dano http://www.flickr.com/photos/mukluk/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mukluk/ / CC BY 2.0

I recently read (unfortunately, I can’t find the reference, or where I read it–it was in print, not online, believe it or not–so this will have to stand as anecdotal) about a study at a school using lecture capture technology. The study compared students’ use of recorded lectures (made available on the web) in two different classes (same academic subject, covering the same content). In one course, the professor lectured through the whole class period, with almost no opportunities for interaction (he took questions at the end) or any activity by students except for listening and note-taking. In the second course, the professor lectured for only brief periods, asking students to step forward and present at various points in the class or to repeat questions that they had sent to him in emails, and integrating discussions and questions throughout the class.

Both classes were recorded–audio and video–and made available to students afterwards.¬† In both cases, standard, simple, lecture capture (a fixed camera, a microphone on the professor and an omni-directional microphone in the room) tools were used.

When the recordings were made available, it turned out that students accessed and viewed the second class–the one that included interaction and active participation from students–even though much of that interaction was not well-captured in the videos.¬† They reported in interviews that they found the class itself to be interesting and engaging, and wanted to review what the professor had said–they felt (does this seem paradoxical?) that they were so interested in class that they might have missed something.

The first class, the captured straight lecture, was not one that students accessed or viewed at all.¬† A few students viewed the page, but interviews afterwards showed that they did not bother to watch more than the first few minutes of the recording.¬† It wasn’t something that they felt was useful either in reviewing for studying, or for understanding the material.

And beyond that, students reported that, because the full lecture was available online, they didn’t feel they needed to bother to attend class–and attendance did, in fact, dip significantly after the first few sessions.¬† So not only were they not using the captured lectures, they were less likely to even attend the actual, in-person lectures.¬† That didn’t happen in the more interactive class–students there continued to attend–felt that they would miss something important if they didn’t, even though the recordings were available.

I’ve been thinking about this, because it reinforces something I’ve always noticed myself, but also because there are some surprises there.¬† I’ve always had big reservations about lecture capture (which unfortunately, too often, is the only model used when thinking about podcasting in higher ed, and even more unfortunately, when thinking about what administrators call “distance learning”).¬† It seems to me that a good lecture (and they do exist, and they are a good thing) is very much a live performance–and it depends to a large extent on that context of live performance for its effectiveness.¬† A recording can have some value–but it’s not a transparent representation.¬† It’s a re-presentation. So it’s taking the performance out of its native medium, plopping it into another, different medium.¬† It loses all the advantages of the original (live, face-to-face) medium, and it gains none of the advantages of the new (online, asynchronous) medium. (The term “lecture capture” is a significant one.¬† It captures the lecture–nails it down, cages it)

This is why, to me, an “online class” (or “distance learning”) is at its least effective, its least interesting, when it’s a series of recorded lectures–unless (which is very rare) those lectures are specifically and intentionally produced for the new medium–then they’re mini-films.¬† An online class should be designed for the online medium–to take advantage of the affordances (hyper-links, multimedia, asynchronicity, threaded discussion, etc., etc) of that medium.

But that study made me think more of an “apples and oranges” question.¬† While confirming my own experience that straight capturing of a straight lecture is pretty much a waste of time and technology (and may even decrease student learning–that was a bit of a surprise to me), that study also indicates that a “lecture” is not always exactly a lecture.¬† When I think of comparing two classes, or two captures, I want to remember to also think of comparing apples to apples.

People often talk about how online classes are necessarily inferior to face-to-face classes, but they say this with built-in assumptions.¬† They compare a terrible online class with an excellent face-to-face class.¬† Similarly, I think that study indicated that it’s not just the fact of the recording that is important–it’s what has been recorded.¬† A good class is still valuable as a recording (contrary to my own automatic assumption).¬† It’s the quality of the class, not the recording, that makes students want to return to it, to think about it, to come back for more.

Faculty development (even with all its varieties and all its difficulties) should always focus on the goal of making classes better–which is always a matter of making students more active, more engaged.¬† Then everything will be apples.¬† And it’s good to remember that sometimes the fact that a class is interesting, is engaging, actually means that students don’t get all they can out of the class–they want to, and need to, return to it again.¬† So in those cases, the recording just might be a useful thing for them.

css.php
Need help with the Commons? Visit our
help page
Send us a message
Skip to toolbar